In Europe, anthropogenic habitats that are optimised for agriculture and
forestry purposes have widely replaced natural habitats. To assess their
value for biodiversity, we compared beetle communities among three
anthropogenic land use types, namely spruce plantations, Christmas tree
plantations and maize fields. These three land use types are all
characterised by high phytobiomass and vertical plant structure and
represent a gradient of anthropogenic impact linked to fertilisation,
pesticide use, frequent operation of machinery and rotation period
length. We found that all components of beetle diversity, i.e.
abundance, number of species and Simpson diversity as well as the number
of threatened beetle species decreased with increasing anthropogenic
impact from spruce plantations to Christmas tree plantations to maize
fields. However, beetle biomass was relatively high in maize fields, due
to the abundant species in this land use type having a high body mass.
Community composition changed with anthropogenic impact. Beetle
communities in maize fields were characterised by a higher frequency of
zoophagous beetles and a lower frequency of saprophagous/mycetophagous
and xylophagous beetles than those in Christmas tree plantations and
spruce plantations. The low value of maize fields for beetle
biodiversity is concerning because the area covered by maize increased
over the last decade by 26.7% and now constitutes 13.5% of arable land
globally.
«
In Europe, anthropogenic habitats that are optimised for agriculture and
forestry purposes have widely replaced natural habitats. To assess their
value for biodiversity, we compared beetle communities among three
anthropogenic land use types, namely spruce plantations, Christmas tree
plantations and maize fields. These three land use types are all
characterised by high phytobiomass and vertical plant structure and
represent a gradient of anthropogenic impact linked to fertilisation,
pesticide us...
»