Providing robots with the ability to move humanlike
is one of the recent challenges for researchers who work on
motion planning in human populated environments. Humanlike
motions help a human interaction partner to intuitively
grasp the intention of the robot. However, the problem of
validating the degree of human-likeness of a robot motion is
rarely addressed, especially for the forward motion during
navigation. One approach is using similarity measures to
compare the robot trajectories directly with human ones. For
this reason, this paper investigates different methods from
the time series analysis that can be applied to measure the
similarity between trajectories: the average Euclidean distance,
the Dynamic Time Warping distance, and the Longest Common
Subsequence. We aim to identify the measure that performs
the same way as a human who rates the similarity. Thus, the
evaluation of the methods is based on a questionnaire that
examines the human perception of differences between walking
motions. It is concluded that the human similarity perception
is reproduced best by using the Dynamic Time Warping and
comparing the derivatives of the path and velocity profiles
instead of the absolute values.
«
Providing robots with the ability to move humanlike
is one of the recent challenges for researchers who work on
motion planning in human populated environments. Humanlike
motions help a human interaction partner to intuitively
grasp the intention of the robot. However, the problem of
validating the degree of human-likeness of a robot motion is
rarely addressed, especially for the forward motion during
navigation. One approach is using similarity measures to
compare the robot trajectories...
»