Flight Crew Performance and CRM Ratings Based on Three Different Perceptions

Based on the foregoing work of Gontar, Hoermann, Deischl, and Haslbeck (2014), this paper presents different aspects of rater reliability in the context of a flight simulator study. For this purpose, 120 commercial airline pilots had to fly a challenging approach scenario in a full flight simulator. Afterwards, both the crew members and the instructor rated the non-technical skills separately for both pilots. Results indicate that social aspects of Crew Resource Management are subject to a broader rating variability than cognitive aspects are. Furthermore, it is indicated that a differentiation between the two crew members is not always possible for the raters.     «

Based on the foregoing work of Gontar, Hoermann, Deischl, and Haslbeck (2014), this paper presents different aspects of rater reliability in the context of a flight simulator study. For this purpose, 120 commercial airline pilots had to fly a challenging approach scenario in a full flight simulator. Afterwards, both the crew members and the instructor rated the non-technical skills separately for both pilots. Results indicate that social aspects of Crew Resource Management are subject to a broad...     »