An increasing number of studies investigate the impact of
pulsed interferences in the frequency bands allocated to
satellite navigation and show that such interferences can
be considered as a significant threat for GNSS receiver
performances. Analytical models which include on the
one side the pulse parameters (pulse peak power, pulse
duty cycle or pulse repetition frequency) and on the other
side the receiver front-end parameters (ADC levels, filter
bandwidth and pulse blanking threshold) already allow to
closely evaluate the corresponding degradations.
However, the impact of the spreading codes and
especially their interaction with the interfering pulses is
usually neglected.
It is indeed often assumed that the randomness of the
spreading codes enables to ignore any repetitive chip
pattern of the code that could correlate with periodical
pulse sequences. Moreover, if the code segments
corrupted by the high power pulses are blanked too, they
are not used afterwards in the correlation process. The
balancedness of the remaining codes should not lead to
any artifact in the signal-to-noise plus interference ratio
(SNIR) estimated with the correlator output. Hence, for
pure random codes, the pulse positions should not
influence the statistical properties of the correlator output.
If however the codes contain series of identical chips, socalled
runs, which are synchronized and similar to the
pulse sequence and if these runs are not perfectly blanked,
the effective SNIR will likely be modified. Although the
design of navigation codes should guarantee that such
periodical chip patterns do not exist, detailed
investigations show that certain properties of non-strictly
random codes could still give rise to some unexpected
results for the SNIR.
It is consequently the intention of this paper to first set-up
a more accurate analytical model for the impact of pulsed
signals onto the receiver SNIR and secondly to show that
in some specific conditions, non-ideal code properties
might lead to anomalies of the SNIR degradation in a
pulsed interference environment. Such conditions are 1)
Non-ideal randomness properties of the spreading
sequences, 2) Pulse interference sequences which are
synchronized with sub-patterns of the codes and 3)
Specific configurations of the receiver front-end which
favor such SNIR degradations.
«
An increasing number of studies investigate the impact of
pulsed interferences in the frequency bands allocated to
satellite navigation and show that such interferences can
be considered as a significant threat for GNSS receiver
performances. Analytical models which include on the
one side the pulse parameters (pulse peak power, pulse
duty cycle or pulse repetition frequency) and on the other
side the receiver front-end parameters (ADC levels, filter
bandwidth and pulse blanking threshol...
»