Dislocation is a severe complication after total hip replacement which may cause revision surgery in some cases. The use of constraint inserts that are coupled to the femoral head by a snapping mechanism provides an opportunity for treatment of recurrent dislocations. This study was aimed to investigate the assembling and retention forces of a specific constraint liner. Using a universal testing machine the assembling forces were determined for head sizes of 28 and 32 mm and the clinically mostly used as well as the maximum cup size. Subsequently, under variation of load direction and pull-out velocity the retention forces were investigated. For primary assembly of the head the required compressive forces were in a range from 197 N and 283 N depending on head and cup size (each size n = 3). Repeated assembly led to a decrease of these forces up to 29%. The retention forces always were slightly below the assembling forces, i. e. forces to remove the heads from the inserts were between 183 N and 230 N (each size n = 3). Repeated disconnection caused a decrease of the retention forces up to 16%. An increase of load velocity as well as an oblique load direction resulted in an enhancement of the retention forces. For all investigated implant sizes the retention force for the femoral head was approximately ten-times less than the interface strength between the insert and the metal-back. In case of correct implant handling the risk of disconnection between the tested constraint insert and the corresponding metal-back has not to be considered in clinical practice.     «

Dislocation is a severe complication after total hip replacement which may cause revision surgery in some cases. The use of constraint inserts that are coupled to the femoral head by a snapping mechanism provides an opportunity for treatment of recurrent dislocations. This study was aimed to investigate the assembling and retention forces of a specific constraint liner. Using a universal testing machine the assembling forces were determined for head sizes of 28 and 32 mm and the clinically mostl...     »