Understanding the factors that affect life cycle costs in the
earliest stages of product development bring valuable insights
for vehicle architecture decision making. This study presents a
life cycle costing model used to compare hybrid electric
vehicle architectures with varying levels of electrification to a
reference conventional car. The work presented highlights the
importance of considering total costs of ownership (COO) and
operation alongside manufacturing costs in making strategic
business decisions.
Results from the life cycle cost model scenarios set for
2015-2024 show that car architectures with increased electric
range capability allow for significant customer fuel cost
savings. These savings can offset increased manufacturing
costs within the first three years of ownership based on US
Energy Information Agency (EIA) current fuel and electricity
pricing forecasts. If fuel prices or annual vehicle use remain
low, electrification becomes less attractive as payback periods
are extended beyond 10 years time. Regardless of future
energy pricing scenarios, the fixed costs of vehicle ownership
remain the largest costs to the end user. Manufacturers can use
this information to their advantage in creating new business
models and designing cars that deliver increased value to the
end customer. Because electrification significantly reduces
CO2 tailpipe emissions, government incentives and taxing
schemes are expected to play a positive roll in offsetting a
large part of the additional manufacturing costs.
Finally, optimization methods are used to determine
sensitivities of variables that affect total cost of ownership. Of
these variables the user’s city/highway driving profiles and the
price of fuel/Electricity have the greatest sensitivity to cost of
ownership.
«