The emerging mass individualization (Koren et al., 2015) in series produced road vehicles, superseding mass customization, entails an increase in variants and complexity. The question “How may the functional safety development effort, corresponding to the variant numbers and complexity be tackled while complying to the standard ISO 26262:2018? (ISO, 2018)” motivates this work. The lever on containing the effort is most effective when applied in the development life-cycle as early as possible. The initiating functional safety artifact is the item definition. Strategic clustering of variants into a few or even a single item-definition(s) is feasible by exploiting platform development. Yet, the functional safety development effort for each defined item may only be limited when basing all subsequent phases on one single representative variant. In this work we particularly elaborate on answering the question “Under what conditions can a representative variant be defined?”, accompanied by the notion of “How is it defined?”. Therefore, we assess the ISO 26262:2018 (ISO, 2018) for deriving prerequisites on a representative variant. Furthermore, we propose a structured and efficient method to determine representative variants given vehicle parameters and a framing context. The method is exemplified for two easily comprehensible use-case situations in drivetrain development. The characteristic equations may be used for future drivetrain functional safety development.     «

The emerging mass individualization (Koren et al., 2015) in series produced road vehicles, superseding mass customization, entails an increase in variants and complexity. The question “How may the functional safety development effort, corresponding to the variant numbers and complexity be tackled while complying to the standard ISO 26262:2018? (ISO, 2018)” motivates this work. The lever on containing the effort is most effective when applied in the development life-cycle as early as possible....     »