Aytekin, Alp; Scalamogna, Maria; Coughlan, J J; Lahu, Shqipdona; Ndrepepa, Gjin; Menichelli, Maurizio; Mayer, Katharina; Wöhrle, Jochen; Bernlochner, Isabell; Witzenbichler, Bernhard; Hochholzer, Willibald; Sibbing, Dirk; Angiolillo, Dominick J; Hemetsberger, Rayyan; Tölg, Ralph; Valina, Christian; Müller, Arne; Kufner, Sebastian; Liebetrau, Christoph; Xhepa, Erion; Hapfelmeier, Alexander; Sager, Hendrik B; Joner, Michael; Richardt, Gert; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Neumann, Franz Josef; Schunkert, Heribert; Schüpke, Stefanie; Kastrati, Adnan; Cassese, Salvatore     «

Aytekin, Alp; Scalamogna, Maria; Coughlan, J J; Lahu, Shqipdona; Ndrepepa, Gjin; Menichelli, Maurizio; Mayer, Katharina; Wöhrle, Jochen; Bernlochner, Isabell; Witzenbichler, Bernhard; Hochholzer, Willibald; Sibbing, Dirk; Angiolillo, Dominick J; Hemetsberger, Rayyan; Tölg, Ralph; Valina, Christian; Müller, Arne; Kufner, Sebastian; Liebetrau, Christoph; Xhepa, Erion; Hapfelmeier, Alexander; Sager, Hendrik B; Joner, Michael; Richardt, Gert; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Neumann, Franz Josef; Schunkert, H...     »

BACKGROUND: The ISAR-REACT 5 trial compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS managed invasively. The present study sought to investigate the impact of ticagrelor and prasugrel on the incidence and pattern of urgent revascularization in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This post-hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included all ACS patients who underwent PCI. The primary endpoint for this analysis was the incidence of urgent revascularization at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcome was the pattern of urgent revascularization procedures (namely, urgent target vessel/non-target vessel revascularization - TVR/NTVR). Among 3,377 ACS patients who underwent PCI, 1,676 were assigned to ticagrelor and 1,701 to prasugrel before PCI. After 12 months, the incidence of urgent revascularization was higher among patients assigned to ticagrelor as compared to prasugrel (6.8% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.75; p = 0.051), mostly attributable to significantly more urgent NTVR in the ticagrelor group (3.8% vs. 2.4%; HR = 1.62 [1.09-2.41]; p = 0.017). The risk of urgent TVR did not differ between treatment groups (3.3% vs. 3.0%; HR = 1.13 [0.77-1.65]; p = 0.546). CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients treated with PCI, the cumulative rate of urgent revascularizations after 12 months is higher with ticagrelor compared to prasugrel, due to a significant increase in urgent revascularizations involving remote coronary vessels.      «

BACKGROUND: The ISAR-REACT 5 trial compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS managed invasively. The present study sought to investigate the impact of ticagrelor and prasugrel on the incidence and pattern of urgent revascularization in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This post-hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included all ACS patients who underwent PCI. The primary endp...     »