Quantification of Kuramoto Coupling Between Intrinsic Brain Networks Applied to fMRI Data in Major Depressive Disorder.

Organized patterns of system-wide neural activity adapt fluently within the brain to adjust behavioral performance to environmental demands. In major depressive disorder (MD), markedly different co-activation patterns across the brain emerge from a rather similar structural substrate. Despite the application of advanced methods to describe the functional architecture, e.g., between intrinsic brain networks (IBNs), the underlying mechanisms mediating these differences remain elusive. Here we propose a novel complementary approach for quantifying the functional relations between IBNs based on the Kuramoto model. We directly estimate the Kuramoto coupling parameters (K) from IBN time courses derived from empirical fMRI data in 24 MD patients and 24 healthy controls. We find a large pattern with a significant number of Ks depending on the disease severity score Hamilton D, as assessed by permutation testing. We successfully reproduced the dependency in an independent test data set of 44 MD patients and 37 healthy controls. Comparing the results to functional connectivity from partial correlations (FC), to phase synchrony (PS) as well as to first order auto-regressive measures (AR) between the same IBNs did not show similar correlations. In subsequent validation experiments with artificial data we find that a ground truth of parametric dependencies on artificial regressors can be recovered. The results indicate that the calculation of Ks can be a useful addition to standard methods of quantifying the brain's functional architecture.      «

Organized patterns of system-wide neural activity adapt fluently within the brain to adjust behavioral performance to environmental demands. In major depressive disorder (MD), markedly different co-activation patterns across the brain emerge from a rather similar structural substrate. Despite the application of advanced methods to describe the functional architecture, e.g., between intrinsic brain networks (IBNs), the underlying mechanisms mediating these differences remain elusive. Here we prop...     »