Railway timetabling in Europe is shifting towards passenger-centered, connection-optimized
network timetables with synchronized stops at major nodes. This changes structural properties,
affecting capacity utilization and corridor robustness. This paper analyzes the effects resulting
from this new timetabling paradigm by assessing the relationship between timetable structure
and corridor capacity. It establishes an approach to systematically relate structural tendencies of
timetable concepts to their implications for performance by examining distributions of timetable
ensembles for specific concepts in a structural feature space. Using a heuristic ensemble
generation method, we study timetables with varying structural properties. Features quantifying
service characteristics are defined and evaluated for their impact on stability using Kendall’s
correlation and regression. Two subclasses — periodic timetables with regular patterns and
integrated (timed-transfer) timetables — are compared through their ensemble distributions
in the feature space. For 3106 timetables, running time margins emerge as the dominant
factor in corridor stability, especially when converting to timed-transfer timetables on existing,
non-travel-time-optimized infrastructure. Results suggest that, with more structured timetables,
running time supplements rather than tightly constrained buffer times deserve greater attention
in capacity assessment and the dimensioning of service concepts on rail corridors.
«
Railway timetabling in Europe is shifting towards passenger-centered, connection-optimized
network timetables with synchronized stops at major nodes. This changes structural properties,
affecting capacity utilization and corridor robustness. This paper analyzes the effects resulting
from this new timetabling paradigm by assessing the relationship between timetable structure
and corridor capacity. It establishes an approach to systematically relate structural tendencies of
timetable concepts...
»