This paper aims at identifying ontological categories as higher-order knowledge
structures that underlie engineering students' thinking about technical systems. Derived
from interviews, these ontological categories include, inter alia, a focus on the
behavior, structure, or purpose of a technical system. We designed and administered
a paper-based test to assess these ontological categories in a sample of N = 340
first-year students in different engineering disciplines. Based on their activation patterns
across ontological categories, students clustered into six different ontological profiles.
Study program, gender as well as objective and self-perceived cognitive abilities
were associated with differences in jointly activated ontological categories. Additional
idiosyncratic influences and experiences, however, seemed to play a more important
role. Our results can inform university instruction and support successful co-operation
in engineering.
«
This paper aims at identifying ontological categories as higher-order knowledge
structures that underlie engineering students' thinking about technical systems. Derived
from interviews, these ontological categories include, inter alia, a focus on the
behavior, structure, or purpose of a technical system. We designed and administered
a paper-based test to assess these ontological categories in a sample of N = 340
first-year students in different engineering disciplines. Based on their activa...
»