Login
mediaTUM GesamtbestandEinrichtungenSchools TUM School of Medicine and HealthDepartmentsClinical MedicineInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie (Prof. Makowski)Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (Prof. Zimmer)Professur für Neuroradiologie (Prof. Zimmer)2023
- Title:
Impact of radiation dose reduction and iterative image reconstruction on CT-guided spine biopsies.
- Document type:
- Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Author(s):
- Paprottka, Karolin J; Kupfer, Karina; Schultz, Vivian; Beer, Meinrad; Zimmer, Claus; Baum, Thomas; Kirschke, Jan S; Sollmann, Nico
- Abstract:
- This study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of dose reduction on image quality and confidence for intervention planning and guidance regarding computed tomography (CT)-based intervertebral disc and vertebral body biopsies. We retrospectively analyzed 96 patients who underwent multi-detector CT (MDCT) acquired for the purpose of biopsies, which were either derived from scanning with standard dose (SD) or low dose (LD; using tube current reduction). The SD cases were matched to LD cases considering sex, age, level of biopsy, presence of spinal instrumentation, and body diameter. All images for planning (reconstruction: "IMR1") and periprocedural guidance (reconstruction: "iDose4") were evaluated by two readers (R1 and R2) using Likert scales. Image noise was measured using attenuation values of paraspinal muscle tissue. The dose length product (DLP) was statistically significantly lower for LD scans regarding the planning scans (SD: 13.8 ± 8.2 mGy*cm, LD: 8.1 ± 4.4 mGy*cm, p < 0.01) and the interventional guidance scans (SD: 43.0 ± 48.8 mGy*cm, LD: 18.4 ± 7.3 mGy*cm, p < 0.01). Image quality, contrast, determination of the target structure, and confidence for planning or intervention guidance were rated good to perfect for SD and LD scans, showing no statistically significant differences between SD and LD scans (p > 0.05). Image noise was similar between SD and LD scans performed for planning of the interventional procedures (SD: 14.62 ± 2.83 HU vs. LD: 15.45 ± 3.22 HU, p = 0.24). Use of a LD protocol for MDCT-guided biopsies along the spine is a practical alternative, maintaining overall image quality and confidence. Increasing availability of model-based iterative reconstruction in clinical routine may facilitate further radiation dose reductions.
- Journal title abbreviation:
- Sci Rep
- Year:
- 2023
- Journal volume:
- 13
- Journal issue:
- 1
- Fulltext / DOI:
- doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32102-9
- Pubmed ID:
- http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977710
- Print-ISSN:
- 2045-2322
- TUM Institution:
- Professur für Neuroradiologie (Prof. Zimmer)
BibTeX
Occurrences:
- mediaTUM GesamtbestandEinrichtungenSchools TUM School of Medicine and HealthDepartmentsClinical MedicineInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie (Prof. Makowski)Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie (Prof. Zimmer)Professur für Neuroradiologie (Prof. Zimmer)2023