Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block.

Unterbuchner, Christoph; Blobner, Manfred; Pühringer, Friedrich; Janda, Matthias; Bischoff, Sebastian; Bein, Berthold; Schmidt, Annette; Ulm, Kurt; Pithamitsis, Viktor; Fink, Heidrun

doi:10.1186/s12871-017-0393-4

Klinik für Anästhesiologie (DHM)

Zurück
Zurück zum Anfang der Trefferliste
Dauerhafter Link zum angezeigten Objekt

Titel:: Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block.
Dokumenttyp:: Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article
Autor(en):: Unterbuchner, Christoph; Blobner, Manfred; Pühringer, Friedrich; Janda, Matthias; Bischoff, Sebastian; Bein, Berthold; Schmidt, Annette; Ulm, Kurt; Pithamitsis, Viktor; Fink, Heidrun
Abstract:: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is the gold standard to detect postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Many anesthesiologists, however, use insensitive, qualitative neuromuscular monitoring or unreliable, clinical tests. Goal of this multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, assessor controlled study was to develop an algorithm of muscle function tests to identify PORC.After extubation a blinded anesthetist performed eight clinical tests in 165 patients. Test results were correlated to calibrated electromyography train-of-four (TOF) ratio and to a postoperatively applied uncalibrated acceleromyography. A classification and regression tree (CART) was calculated developing the algorithm to identify PORC. This was validated against uncalibrated acceleromyography and tactile judgement of TOF fading in separate 100 patients.After eliminating three tests with poor correlation, a model with four tests (r = 0.844) and uncalibrated acceleromyography (r = 0.873) were correlated to electromyographical TOF-values without losing quality of prediction. CART analysis showed that three consecutively performed tests (arm lift, head lift and swallowing or eye opening) can predict electromyographical TOF. Prediction coefficients reveal an advantage of the uncalibrated acceleromyography in terms of specificity to identify the EMG measured train-of-four ratio < 0.7 (100% vs. 42.9%) and <0.9 (89.7% vs. 34.5%) compared to the algorithm. However, due to the high sensitivity of the algorithm (100% vs. 94.4%), the risk to overlook an awake patient with a train-of-four ratio < 0.7 was minimal. Tactile judgement of TOF fading showed poorest sensitivity and specifity at train of four ratio < 0.9 (33.7%, 0%) and <0.7 (18.8%, 16.7%).Residual neuromuscular blockade can be detected by uncalibrated acceleromyography and if not available by a pathway of four clinical muscle function tests in awake patients. The algorithm has a discriminative power comparable to uncalibrated AMG within TOF-values >0.7 and <0.3.Clinical Trials.gov (principal investigator's name: CU, and identifier: NCT03219138) on July 8, 2017.
Zeitschriftentitel:: BMC Anesthesiol
Jahr:: 2017
Band / Volume:: 17
Heft / Issue:: 1
Seitenangaben Beitrag:: 101
Sprache:: eng
Volltext / DOI:: doi:10.1186/s12871-017-0393-4
PubMed:: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778151
Print-ISSN:: 1471-2253
TUM Einrichtung:: Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie; Klinik für Anästhesiologie (DHM)
BibTeX