Validation of the X-Vision ERCP Training System and technical challenges during early training of sphincterotomy.

von Delius, S; Thies, P; Meining, A; Wagenpfeil, S; Burian, M; Huber, W; Weidenbach, H; Ebert, MP; Neu, B; Ludwig, L; Almeida, J; Prinz, C; Schmid, RM; Frimberger, E

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.004

journal article

Title:: Validation of the X-Vision ERCP Training System and technical challenges during early training of sphincterotomy.
Document type:: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Studies
Author(s):: von Delius, S; Thies, P; Meining, A; Wagenpfeil, S; Burian, M; Huber, W; Weidenbach, H; Ebert, MP; Neu, B; Ludwig, L; Almeida, J; Prinz, C; Schmid, RM; Frimberger, E
Abstract:: BACKGROUND & AIMS: A new fluoroscopy-free training system for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with different model subtypes recently was developed. This study aimed to establish construct validity by investigating whether the X-Vision ERCP Training System could distinguish experienced endoscopists from beginners and to reveal characteristic mistakes during sphincterotomy. METHODS: Six staff gastroenterologists that practice ERCP, 10 trainees that perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy, and 12 residents without endoscopic experience each sequentially attempted 4 different models, simulating selective cannulation of the pancreatic or bile duct, intubation of differently arranged rubber papillas, stent placement, and sphincterotomy of a biopapilla. Performance parameters were recorded and participants' expectations were compared before and after training to determine whether the simulator was a credible tool for ERCP training. Staff gastroenterologists graded the realism and utility of the simulation. The quality of sphincterotomy was assessed by an expert endoscopist. RESULTS: Participants with ERCP experience had significantly shorter procedure times compared with those with intermediate (P < .001) or no endoscopic experience (P < .001). Total and single credibility scores significantly increased after simulator practice. The faculty found the X-Vision ERCP Training System to be realistic and useful for training. In the less-experienced groups, common mistakes made during sphincterotomy included inadequate positioning of the duodenoscope, traumatic intubation of the papilla, and continued cutting despite insufficient endoscopic view. CONCLUSIONS: The X-Vision ERCP Training System distinguished subjects with different levels of experience and was regarded as realistic and useful for ERCP training. Common mistakes during sphincterotomy could be assessed objectively.
Journal title abbreviation:: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Year:: 2009
Journal volume:: 7
Journal issue:: 4
Pages contribution:: 389-96
Language:: eng
Fulltext / DOI:: doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.004
Pubmed ID:: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19049832
Print-ISSN:: 1542-3565
TUM Institution:: II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Gastroenterologie); Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie
BibTeX