Login
- Titel:
Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery.
- Dokumenttyp:
- Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Autor(en):
- Strong, EB; Rafii, A; Holhweg-Majert, B; Fuller, SC; Metzger, MC
- Abstract:
- OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of 3 computer-aided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction. DESIGN: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim. SETTING: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Four fresh cadaveric heads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean target registration error. RESULTS: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The StealthStation was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.
- Zeitschriftentitel:
- Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
- Jahr:
- 2008
- Band / Volume:
- 134
- Heft / Issue:
- 10
- Seitenangaben Beitrag:
- 1080-4
- Sprache:
- eng
- Volltext / DOI:
- doi:10.1001/archotol.134.10.1080
- PubMed:
- http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18936355
- Print-ISSN:
- 0886-4470
- TUM Einrichtung:
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
BibTeX