User: Guest  Login
Document type:
Journal Article
Author(s):
Imhoff, Florian B; Camenzind, Roland S; Obopilwe, Elifho; Cote, Mark P; Mehl, Julian; Beitzel, Knut; Imhoff, Andreas B; Mazzocca, Augustus D; Arciero, Robert A; Dyrna, Felix G E
Title:
Glenoid retroversion is an important factor for humeral head centration and the biomechanics of posterior shoulder stability.
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Glenoid retroversion is a known independent risk factor for recurrent posterior instability. The purpose was to investigate progressive angles of glenoid retroversion and their influence on humeral head centration and posterior translation with intact, detached, and repaired posterior labrum in a cadaveric human shoulder model. METHODS: A total of 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were investigated for this study. After CT- canning, the glenoids were aligned parallel to the floor, with the capsule intact, and the humerus was fixed in 60° of abduction and neutral rotation. Version of the glenoid was created after wedge resection from posterior and fixed with an external fixator throughout the testing. Specimens underwent three conditions: intact, detached, and repaired posterior labrum, while version of the glenoid was set from + 5° anteversion to - 25° retroversion by 5° increments. Within the biomechanical setup, the glenohumeral joint was axially loaded (22 N) to center the joint. At 0° of glenoid version and intact labrum, the initial position was used as baseline and served as point zero of centerization. After cyclic preloading, posterior translation force (20 N) was then applied by a material testing machine, while start and endpoints of the scapula placed on an X-Y table were measured. RESULTS: The decentralization of the humeral head at glenoid version angles of 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° of retroversion and 5° of anteversion was significantly different (P < 0.001). Every increment of 5° of retroversion led to an additional decentralization of the humeral head overall by (average ± SD) 2.0 mm ± 0.3 in the intact and 2.0 mm ± 0.7 in the detached labrum condition. The repaired showed significantly lower posterior translation compared to the intact condition at 10° (P = 0.012) and 15° (P < 0.01) of retroversion. In addition, CT measured parameters (depth, diameter, and native version) of the glenoid showed no correlation with angle of dislocation of each specimen. CONCLUSION: Bony alignment in terms of glenoid retroversion angle plays an important role in joint centration and posterior translation, especially in retroversion angles greater than 10°. Isolated posterior labrum repair has a significant effect on posterior translation in glenoid retroversion angles of 5° and 10°. Bony correction of glenoid version may be considered to address posterior shoulder instability with retroversion > 15°.
Journal title abbreviation:
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Year:
2019
Journal volume:
27
Journal issue:
12
Pages contribution:
3952-3961
Fulltext / DOI:
doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05573-5
Pubmed ID:
http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254026
Print-ISSN:
0942-2056
TUM Institution:
Fachgebiet Sportorthopädie (Prof. Imhoff)
 BibTeX