PURPOSE: The use of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) contributes to an improved extent of resection. Hybrid operating room MRI suites have been established, with the patient being transferred to the MRI scanner. In the present descriptive analysis, we compared the rate of surgical site infections (SSI) after intracranial tumor surgery with and without the use of ioMRI. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 446 patients with open craniotomy performed for brain tumor surgery. One hundred fourteen patients were operated on with the use of ioMRI between June 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019 (group 1). During the same period, 126 patients were operated on without ioMRI (group 2). As an additional control group, we analyzed 206 patients operated on from February 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018 when ioMRI had not yet been implemented (group 3). RESULTS: The rate of SSI in group 1 (11.4%), group 2 (9.5%), and group 3 (6.8%) did not differ significantly (p = 0.352). Additional resection after ioMRI did not result in a significantly elevated number of SSI. No significant influence of re-resection, prior radio-/chemotherapy, blood loss or duration of surgery was found on the incidence of SSI. CONCLUSION: Despite the transfer to a non-sterile MRI scanner, leading to a prolonged operation time, SSI rates with and without the use of ioMRI did not differ significantly. Hence, advantages of ioMRI outweigh potential disadvantages as confirmed by this real-life single-center study.      «

PURPOSE: The use of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) contributes to an improved extent of resection. Hybrid operating room MRI suites have been established, with the patient being transferred to the MRI scanner. In the present descriptive analysis, we compared the rate of surgical site infections (SSI) after intracranial tumor surgery with and without the use of ioMRI. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 446 patients with open craniotomy performed for brain tumor surgery. One hundred fou...     »