User: Guest  Login
Title:

Which meat (substitute) to buy? Is Front of Package Information reliable to identify the healthier and more natural choice?

Document type:
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Author(s):
Petersen, Thies; Hartmann, Monika; Hirsch, Stefan
Non-TUM Co-author(s):
ja
Cooperation:
national
Abstract:
Environmental, ethical and health concerns have damaged the image of meat products for some consumer groups. As a result, the relevance of meat substitutes (MS) and the labelling of credence attributes has increased. However, it is unclear whether MS do indeed make the grade regarding nutritional quality when compared to meat and whether the Front-of-package (FOP) labelling provides reliable information for consumers. Therefore, in this article, we analyse the nutritional quality of different me...     »
Keywords:
Meat innovation; meat substitute innovation; nutritional quality; food additive; front-of-package labelling
Intellectual Contribution:
Discipline-based Research
Journal title:
Food Quality and Preference
Journal listet in FT50 ranking:
nein
Year:
2021
Year / month:
2021-06
Pages contribution:
104298
Fulltext / DOI:
doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104298
Publisher:
Elsevier BV
E-ISSN:
0950-3293
Date of publication:
01.05.2021
Semester:
SS 21
Judgement review:
0
Key publication:
Nein
Peer reviewed:
Ja
Commissioned:
not commissioned
Technology:
Nein
Interdisciplinarity:
Nein
Mission statement:
Health, Nutrition
Ethics and Sustainability:
Nein
 BibTeX