This retrospective study analysed the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-staging compared to morphological imaging (MI) for patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer, validated by histopathology after radical prostatectomy. On patient-based analyses the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET vs. MI were 72%, 93% and 86% vs. 50%, 73% and 66%, respectively. The results show that 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET is significantly superior to MI. Its diagnostic efficacy is similar to published data for other PSMA-ligands.
«
This retrospective study analysed the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-staging compared to morphological imaging (MI) for patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer, validated by histopathology after radical prostatectomy. On patient-based analyses the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET vs. MI were 72%, 93% and 86% vs. 50%, 73% and 66%, respectively. The results show that 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET is significantly superior to MI. Its diagnostic efficacy is simila...
»