Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures.

Sollmann, Nico; Mei, Kai; Hedderich, Dennis M; Maegerlein, Christian; Kopp, Felix K; Löffler, Maximilian T; Zimmer, Claus; Rummeny, Ernst J; Kirschke, Jan S; Baum, Thomas; Noël, Peter B

doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2

journal article

Title:: Multi-detector CT imaging: impact of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on detection of vertebral fractures.
Document type:: Journal Article
Author(s):: Sollmann, Nico; Mei, Kai; Hedderich, Dennis M; Maegerlein, Christian; Kopp, Felix K; Löffler, Maximilian T; Zimmer, Claus; Rummeny, Ernst J; Kirschke, Jan S; Baum, Thomas; Noël, Peter B
Abstract:: PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared. RESULTS: A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners. KEY POINTS: • MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 50% still showed high diagnostic accuracy without any missed vertebral fractures. • Clinically acceptable determination of vertebral fracture age was possible in MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 75%. • With sparse sampling, higher reductions in radiation exposure can be achieved without compromised image or diagnostic quality in routine MDCT of the spine as compared to MDCT with reduced tube currents.
Journal title abbreviation:: Eur Radiol
Year:: 2019
Journal volume:: 29
Journal issue:: 7
Pages contribution:: 3606-3616
Fulltext / DOI:: doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06090-2
Pubmed ID:: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903337
Print-ISSN:: 0938-7994
TUM Institution:: Fachgebiet Neuroradiologie (Prof. Zimmer); Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
BibTeX