Evaluation of a shortened cardiac MRI protocol for left ventricular examinations: diagnostic performance of T1-mapping and myocardial function analysis.

Nadjiri, Jonathan; Zaschka, Anna-Lena; Straeter, Alexandra S; Sauter, Andreas; Englmaier, Maximilian; Weis, Florian; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Rummeny, Ernst J; Pfeiffer, Daniela; Rasper, Michael

doi:10.1186/s12880-019-0358-9

2019

Zurück
Zurück zum Anfang der Trefferliste
Dauerhafter Link zum angezeigten Objekt

Titel:: Evaluation of a shortened cardiac MRI protocol for left ventricular examinations: diagnostic performance of T1-mapping and myocardial function analysis.
Dokumenttyp:: Journal Article
Autor(en):: Nadjiri, Jonathan; Zaschka, Anna-Lena; Straeter, Alexandra S; Sauter, Andreas; Englmaier, Maximilian; Weis, Florian; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Rummeny, Ernst J; Pfeiffer, Daniela; Rasper, Michael
Abstract:: BACKGROUND: In this study we sought to retrospectively evaluate whether a very brief cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocol sufficiently distinguishes patients with relevant myocardial changes with need for further examination from healthy subjects. METHODS: Patients with clinical indication for CMR (n = 160) were included in the study. Patients were categorized into two groups depending on presence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. ROC-analysis was done for results of T1-, T2- mapping and extracellular volume evaluation in patients without LV dysfunction. Binary endpoint was correctly depicted pathology of the conventional qualitative CMR techniques and report. RESULTS: In the patient cohort without LV dysfunction (49%), AUC for T1 mapping was 82% (p < 0.001), 60% for T2 mapping (p = 0.1) and 79% for ECV (p < 0.001). T1 mapping was significantly superior to T2 mapping to rule out left ventricular pathology (p = 0.012). Sensitivity for the combined use of T1 mapping and sBTFE cine imaging was 98%; the negative predictive value was 90%. In 49 patients (30%) full protocol CMR did not provide any additional information; T1 mapping correctly detected 57% of the subjects from this group who would not benefit from additional CMR. CONCLUSION: A shortened CMR protocol comprising T1 mapping and LV-function analysis seems suitable to rule out myocardial alterations. Every third patient of the study population did not benefit from full contrast enhanced CMR. The shortened protocol correctly identified every fifth patient who would not benefit but no relevant pathologic findings with the obligation for treatment were missed.
Zeitschriftentitel:: BMC Med Imaging
Jahr:: 2019
Band / Volume:: 19
Heft / Issue:: 1
Volltext / DOI:: doi:10.1186/s12880-019-0358-9
PubMed:: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340756
TUM Einrichtung:: I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Kardiologie)
BibTeX