OBJECTIV: e This study evaluated a psychoeducational intervention that aimed to facilitate return to work.The randomized-controlled study trial was established at three psychiatric hospitals. The status of permanent employment in an age group of 18 to 60 served as main inclusion criterion. The intervention consisted of 5 sessions and covered topics such as disclosure of the diagnosis to colleagues and supervisors or legal frameworks in the return-to-work process. Participants of the control group received treatment as usual.The informative value of the comparisons was decreased by strong differences between the groups at baseline due to an allocation bias. However, participants of the intervention group felt more secure and prepared regarding their return to the workplace. In addition, participants developed a higher level of understanding regarding their rights within the legal frameworks when returning to work. More participants of the control group returned to work within 3 months. The decisive factor for a successful return to work was the intention of the participants to return at baseline.The psychoeducational program was well accepted among participants and appeared to be a useful addition to individual counseling by social workers. However,the program did not increase the likelihood to return to work within three months.     «

OBJECTIV: e This study evaluated a psychoeducational intervention that aimed to facilitate return to work.The randomized-controlled study trial was established at three psychiatric hospitals. The status of permanent employment in an age group of 18 to 60 served as main inclusion criterion. The intervention consisted of 5 sessions and covered topics such as disclosure of the diagnosis to colleagues and supervisors or legal frameworks in the return-to-work process. Participants of the control grou...     »