Background:
Coronary CT Angiography has emerged as a useful diagnostic imaging modality for non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with low to intermediate risk profile. But concerns have been raised about radiation exposure during coronary CTA. The use of a 100 kVp tube voltage scan protocol effectively lowers coronary CTA radiation dose. Recent studies have demonstrated an infrequent use of this dose-reduction strategy in daily practice which is most likely explained by a lack of scientific data demonstrating maintained image quality.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and radiation dose using a 100 kVp tube voltage scan protocol compared with standard 120 kVp for coronary computed tomography angiography
Methods:
400 non-obese patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CTA for suspected artery disease were enrolled in 8 institutions. 202 patients were randomly assigned to a 100 kV protocol and 198 patients to a 120 kV protocol. The primary end point was to demonstrate non-inferiority in image quality with the 100 kV protocol, which was assessed by a 4-point grading score. Secondary end points included radiation dose and need for additional diagnostic tests during follow-up.
Two independent observers assigned a score from 1 to 4 to each coronary artery as follows: score 4 for excellent image quality, score 3 for good image quality despite presence of smaller artifacts, score 2 for sufficient image quality but considerable artefacts and score 1 for non-diagnostic image quality. For the non-inferiority analysis, a margin of -0.2 image quality score points for the difference between both scan protocols was pre-defined. Effective dose was determined based on the dose-length product. Furthermore, the need for subsequent cardiac tests was assessed by a telephone-interview with every patient after 30 days.
Results:
The 100 kV protocol was associated with a 31% relative reduction in radiation exposure (dose-length product: 868 ± 317 mGy x cm with 120 kV vs. 599 ± 255 mGy x cm with 100 kVp; p = 0.0001). The mean image quality scores in the two groups did not differ (100 kV- Group: 3.30 ±0.67; 120kV-Group 3.28 ± 0.68; p = 0.742).Image quality of the 100 kVp protocol was not inferior, as demonstrated by the 97.5% confidence interval of the difference, which did not cross the pre-defined noninferiority margin of -0.2. At 30-day follow-up, the need for additional diagnostic studies did not differ (13.4% vs. 19.2% for 100 kV vs. 120 kV, respectively; p = 0.114).
Conclusions
A coronary CTA protocol using 100 kV tube voltage in non-obese patients maintained image quality, but reduced radiation exposure by 31% as compared with the standard 120 kVp protocol. Thus, 100 kVp scan protocols should be considered for nonobese patients to keep radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable.
«