Login
- Dokumenttyp:
- Journal Article
- Autor(en):
- Otto, Alexander; Scheiderer, Bastian; Murphy, Matthew; Savino, Alexander; Mehl, Julian; Kia, Cameron; Obopilwe, Elifho; DiVenere, Jessica; Cote, Mark P; Denard, Patrick J; Romeo, Anthony A; Mazzocca, Augustus D
- Titel:
- Biconcave glenoids show 3 differently oriented posterior erosion patterns.
- Abstract:
- BACKGROUND: Posterior glenoid wear remains a challenge in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) because of an asymmetric erosion with altered retroversion. The purpose of this study was to assess glenoid morphology and evaluate the influence of acromial orientation in posterior glenoid erosion patterns by using 3-dimensional (3D) models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomographic (CT) shoulder scans from 3 study centers of patients awaiting rTSA between 2017 and 2018 were converted into 3D models and analyzed by 2 observers. Morphology, orientation and greatest depth of erosion, inclination, current retroversion and premorbid retroversion, surface areas of the glenoid, and external acromial orientation and posterior acromial slope were assessed. Measurements were compared between wear patterns, glenoid erosion entities, and genders. RESULTS: In the complete cohort of 68 patients (63.8 ± 10.0 years; 19 female, 49 male), a mean of 85.9° (±22.2°) was observed for the glenoid erosion orientation. Additionally, a further distinct classification of the glenoid erosion as posterior-central (PC, n = 39), posterior-inferior (PI, n = 12), and posterior-superior (PS, n = 17) wear patterns was possible. These wear patterns significantly (P < .001) distinguished by erosion orientation (PC = 86.9° ± 12.0°, PI = 116.3° ± 10.3°, PS = 62.3° ± 18.9°). The greatest depth of erosion found was 7.3 ± 2.7 mm in PC wear patterns (PC vs. PI: P = .03; PC vs. PS: n.s.; PI vs. PS: n.s.). Overall, the observed erosion divided the glenoid surface into a paleoglenoid proportion of 48% (±11%) and a neoglenoid proportion of 52% (±12%). For the complete cohort, glenoid inclination was 85.4° (±6.6°), premorbid glenoid retroversion was 80.7° (±8.1°), and current glenoid retroversion was 73.4° (±7.4°), with an estimated increase of 6.9° (±6.0°). The mean external acromial orientation was 118.2° (±8.9°), and the mean posterior acromial slope was 107.2° (±9.6°). There were no further significant differences if parameters were compared by wear patterns, entities, and gender. CONCLUSION: Three significantly differently oriented wear patterns (posterior-superior, posterior-central, and posterior-inferior) were distinguished in shoulders demonstrating posterior wear on axillary imaging. No significant differences between the observed erosion patterns or any relevant correlations were found regarding the orientation of the acromion.
- Zeitschriftentitel:
- J Shoulder Elbow Surg
- Jahr:
- 2021
- Band / Volume:
- 30
- Heft / Issue:
- 11
- Seitenangaben Beitrag:
- 2620-2628
- Volltext / DOI:
- doi:10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.028
- PubMed:
- http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964426
- Print-ISSN:
- 1058-2746
- TUM Einrichtung:
- Fachgebiet Sportorthopädie (Prof. Imhoff)
BibTeX