The “15-Minute City” concept represents a new planning model. Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, this model has gained significant momentum in its popularity, with
several cities considering the integration of certain aspects of the concept. This thesis deals
with the “Zentrale Orte” concept, which is fundamental to German spatial planning, and compares it with the 15-Minute City model. The comparative analysis is based on a literature
review, a GIS analysis, and an accessibility analysis using the “Geo Open Accessibility Tool”.
The 15-Minute City and the “Zentrale Orte” concept are compared in terms of the facilities considered essential in the concepts and the appropriate accessibility of these facilities. While the two concepts require similar facilities, they differ in their accessibility requirements which is confirmed by the accessibility analysis. While most “Grundzentren”, towns providing essential services, fulfil the requirements of the “Zentrale Orte” concept, it does not satisfy those of the 15-Minute City model. This study, based on 63 municipalities in the Munich region, highlights the similarities and differences between the two planning concepts and suggests opportunities for further development of the “Zentrale Orte” concept.
«
The “15-Minute City” concept represents a new planning model. Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, this model has gained significant momentum in its popularity, with
several cities considering the integration of certain aspects of the concept. This thesis deals
with the “Zentrale Orte” concept, which is fundamental to German spatial planning, and compares it with the 15-Minute City model. The comparative analysis is based on a literature
review, a GIS analysis, and an accessibility...
»