Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences.

Bruegel, M; Gaa, J; Waldt, S; Woertler, K; Holzapfel, K; Kiefer, B; Rummeny, EJ

Benutzer: Gast

journal article

Dokumenttyp:: journal article
Autor(en):: Bruegel, M; Gaa, J; Waldt, S; Woertler, K; Holzapfel, K; Kiefer, B; Rummeny, EJ
Titel:: Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences.
Abstract:: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the value of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted (DW) single-shot echo-planar MRI (EPI) and five variants of T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences in the diagnosis of hepatic metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with extrahepatic primary malignant tumors underwent 1.5-T MRI that included DW EPI and the following variants of T2-weighted TSE techniques: breath-hold fat-suppressed HASTE, breath-hold fat-supressed TSE, respiration-triggered fat-suppressed TSE, breath-hold STIR, and respiration-triggered STIR. Images were reviewed independently by two blinded observers who used a 5-point confidence scale to identify lesions. Results were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings and follow-up imaging findings. The accuracy of each technique was measured with free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 118 hepatic metastatic lesions (mean diameter, 12.8 mm; range, 3-84 mm) were evaluated. Accuracy values were higher (p< 0.001) with DW EPI (0.91-0.92) than with the T2-weighted TSE techniques (0.47-0.67). Imaging with the HASTE sequence (0.47-0.52) was less accurate (p< 0.05) than imaging with the breath-hold TSE, breath-hold STIR, respiration-triggered TSE, and respiration-triggered STIR sequences (0.59-0.67). Sensitivity was higher (p< 0.001) with DW EPI (0.88-0.91) than with T2-weighted TSE techniques (0.45-0.62). For small (< or = 10 mm) metastatic lesions only, the differences in sensitivity between DW EPI (0.85) and T2-weighted TSE techniques (0.26-0.44) were even more pronounced. CONCLUSION: DW EPI was more sensitive and more accurate than imaging with T2-weighted TSE techniques. Because of the black-blood effect on vessels and low susceptibility to motion artifacts, DW EPI was particularly useful for the detection of small (< or = 10 mm) metastatic lesions.
Zeitschriftentitel:: AJR Am J Roentgenol
Jahr:: 2008
Band / Volume:: 191
Heft / Issue:: 5
Seitenangaben Beitrag:: 1421-9
Sprache:: eng
PubMed:: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18941080
Print-ISSN:: 0361-803X
TUM Einrichtung:: Institut für Radiologie
BibTeX