OBJECTIVE: Single-pulse navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (sp-nTMS) is used for presurgical motor mapping in patients with motor-eloquent lesions. However, recently introduced paired-pulse nTMS (pp-nTMS) with biphasic pulses could improve motor mapping. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (mean age: 56.0 ± 12.7 years, 53.0% high-grade glioma) with motor-eloquent lesions underwent motor mapping of upper extremity representations and nTMS-based tractography of the corticospinal tract (CST) by both sp-nTMS and pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses for the tumor-affected hemisphere before resection. RESULTS: In three patients (8.8%), conventional sp-nTMS did not provide motor-positive points, in contrast to pp-nTMS that was capable of generating motor maps in all patients. Good concordance between pp-nTMS and sp-nTMS in the spatial location of motor hotspots and center of gravity (CoG) as well as for CST tracking was observed, with pp-nTMS leading to similar motor map volumes (585.0 ± 667.8 vs. 586.8 ± 204.2 mm3, p = 0.9889) with considerably lower resting motor thresholds (35.0 ± 8.8 vs. 32.8 ± 7.6% of stimulator output, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses may provide motor maps even in highly demanding cases with tumor-affected motor structures or edema, using lower stimulation intensity compared to sp-nTMS. SIGNIFICANCE: Pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses could replace standardly used sp-nTMS for motor mapping and may be safer due to lower stimulation intensity.      «

OBJECTIVE: Single-pulse navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (sp-nTMS) is used for presurgical motor mapping in patients with motor-eloquent lesions. However, recently introduced paired-pulse nTMS (pp-nTMS) with biphasic pulses could improve motor mapping. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (mean age: 56.0 ± 12.7 years, 53.0% high-grade glioma) with motor-eloquent lesions underwent motor mapping of upper extremity representations and nTMS-based tractography of the corticospinal tract (CST) by...     »