Benutzer: Gast  Login
Dokumenttyp:
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Autor(en):
Knopf, Sophia; Frahm, Nina; Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M.
Nicht-TUM Koautoren:
nein
Kooperation:
-
Titel:
How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation
Abstract:
Like many ethics debates surrounding emerging technologies, neuroethics is increasingly concerned with the private sector. Here, entrepreneurial visions and claims of how neurotechnology innovation will revolutionize society—from brain-computer-interfaces to neural enhancement and cognitive phenotyping—are confronted with public and policy concerns about the risks and ethical challenges related to such innovations. But while neuroethics frameworks have a longer track record in public sector research such as the U.S. BRAIN Initiative, much less is known about how businesses—and especially start-ups—address ethics in tech development. In this paper, we investigate how actors in the field frame and enact ethics as part of their innovative R&D processes and business models. Drawing on an empirical case study on direct-to-consumer (DTC) neurotechnology start-ups, we find that actors engage in careful boundary-work to anticipate and address public critique of their technologies, which allows them to delineate a manageable scope of their ethics integration. In particular, boundaries are drawn around four areas: the technology’s actual capability, purpose, safety and evidence-base. By drawing such lines of demarcation, we suggest that start-ups make their visions of ethical neurotechnology in society more acceptable, plausible and desirable, favoring their innovations while at the same time assigning discrete responsibilities for ethics. These visions establish a link from the present into the future, mobilizing the latter as promissory place where a technology’s benefits will materialize and to which certain ethical issues can be deferred. In turn, the present is constructed as a moment in which ethical engagement could be delegated to permissive regulatory standards and scientific authority. Our empirical tracing of the construction of ‘ethical realities’ in and by start-ups offers new inroads for ethics research and governance in tech industries beyond neurotechnology.
Stichworte:
Neuroethics; Responsible innovation; Direct-to-consumer neurotechnology; Vanguard visions; Knowledge-control regimes ; STS
Intellectual Contribution:
Discipline-based Research
Zeitschriftentitel:
Science and Engineering Ethics
Journal gelistet in FT50 Ranking:
nein
Jahr:
2023
Band / Volume:
29
Heft / Issue:
1
Seitenangaben Beitrag:
4
Nachgewiesen in:
Web of Science
Volltext / DOI:
doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00421-1
WWW:
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-022-00421-1
Print-ISSN:
1353-3452, 1471-5546
Urteilsbesprechung:
0
Key publication:
Ja
Peer reviewed:
Ja
commissioned:
not commissioned
Technology:
Nein
Interdisziplinarität:
Ja
Leitbild:
;
Ethics und Sustainability:
Ja
 BibTeX