Benutzer: Gast  Login
Dokumenttyp:
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Autor(en):
Strong, EB; Rafii, A; Holhweg-Majert, B; Fuller, SC; Metzger, MC
Titel:
Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of 3 computer-aided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction. DESIGN: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim. SETTING: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Four fresh cadaveric heads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean target registration error. RESULTS: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The StealthStation was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.
Zeitschriftentitel:
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Jahr:
2008
Band / Volume:
134
Heft / Issue:
10
Seitenangaben Beitrag:
1080-4
Sprache:
eng
Volltext / DOI:
doi:10.1001/archotol.134.10.1080
PubMed:
http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18936355
Print-ISSN:
0886-4470
TUM Einrichtung:
Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
 BibTeX