User: Guest  Login
Document type:
Journal Article
Author(s):
Gafita, Andrei; Bieth, Marie; Kroenke, Markus; Tetteh, Giles; Guenther, Elisabeth; Menze, Bjoern; Weber, Wolfgang Andreas; Eiber, Matthias
Title:
qPSMA: Semiautomatic Software for Whole-Body Tumor Burden Assessment in Prostate Cancer Using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT.
Abstract:
Our aim was to introduce and validate qPSMA, a semiautomatic software package for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer patients using 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 11 PET/CT. Methods: qPSMA reads hybrid PET/CT images in DICOM format. Its pipeline was written using Python and C++ languages. A bone mask based on CT and a normal-uptake mask including organs with physiologic 68Ga-PSMA11 uptake are automatically computed. An SUV threshold of 3 and a liver-based threshold are used to segment bone and soft-tissue lesions, respectively. Manual corrections can be applied using different tools. Multiple output parameters are computed, that is, PSMA ligand-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), PSMA ligand-positive total lesion (PSMA-TL), PSMA SUVmean, and PSMA SUVmax Twenty 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT data sets were used to validate and evaluate the performance characteristics of qPSMA. Four analyses were performed: validation of the semiautomatic algorithm for liver background activity determination, assessment of intra- and interobserver variability, validation of data from qPSMA by comparison with Syngo.via, and assessment of computational time and comparison of PSMA PET-derived parameters with serum prostate-specific antigen. Results: Automatic liver background calculation resulted in a mean relative difference of 0.74% (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.996; 95%CI, 0.989; 0.998) compared with METAVOL. Intra- and interobserver variability analyses showed high agreement (all ICCs > 0.990). Quantitative output parameters were compared for 68 lesions. Paired t testing showed no significant differences between the values obtained with the 2 software packages. The ICC estimates obtained for PSMA-TV, PSMA-TL, SUVmean, and SUVmax were 1.000 (95%CI, 1.000; 1.000), 1.000 (95%CI, 1.000; 1.000), 0.995 (95%CI, 0.992; 0.997), and 0.999 (95%CI, 0.999; 1.000), respectively. The first and second reads for intraobserver variability resulted in mean computational times of 13.63 min (range, 8.22-25.45 min) and 9.27 min (range, 8.10-12.15 min), respectively (P = 0.001). Highly significant correlations were found between serum prostate-specific antigen value and both PSMA-TV (r = 0.72, P < 0.001) and PSMA-TL (r = 0.66, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Semiautomatic analyses of whole-body tumor burden in 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT is feasible. qPSMA is a robust software package that can help physicians quantify tumor load in heavily metastasized prostate cancer patients.
Journal title abbreviation:
J Nucl Med
Year:
2019
Journal volume:
60
Journal issue:
9
Pages contribution:
1277-1283
Language:
eng
Fulltext / DOI:
doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.224055
Pubmed ID:
http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850484
Print-ISSN:
0161-5505
TUM Institution:
Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin
 BibTeX