Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kufner, Sebastian; Cassese, Salvatore; Valeskini, Marco; Neumann, Franz-Josef; Schulz-Schüpke, Stefanie; Hoppmann, Petra; Fusaro, Massimiliano; Schunkert, Heribert; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Kastrati, Adnan; Byrne, Robert A

doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.031

2015

Zurück
Zurück zum Anfang der Trefferliste
Dauerhafter Link zum angezeigten Objekt

Titel:: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Dokumenttyp:: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Article
Autor(en):: Kufner, Sebastian; Cassese, Salvatore; Valeskini, Marco; Neumann, Franz-Josef; Schulz-Schüpke, Stefanie; Hoppmann, Petra; Fusaro, Massimiliano; Schunkert, Heribert; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Kastrati, Adnan; Byrne, Robert A
Abstract:: This study sought to investigate the long-term comparative efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), or balloon angioplasty (BA) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis.The optimal treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis remains unknown. Although PEB has shown encouraging results, the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of PEB remains poorly defined.A total of 402 patients with clinically significant restenosis in limus-eluting stents were randomly assigned to receive PEB (n = 137), PES (n = 131), or BA (n = 134). For this analysis, PEB versus PES and PEB versus BA were compared. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion revascularization and the composite of death or myocardial infarction.At a median follow-up of 3 years, the risk of target lesion revascularization was comparable with PEB versus PES (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.33; p = 0.11) and lower with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.74; p < 0.001). The risk of death/myocardial infarction tended to be lower with PEB versus PES (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.07; p = 0.08), due to a lower risk of death (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The risk of death/myocardial infarction was similar with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.0; p = 0.91).At 3 years, the use of PEB as compared with PES to treat patients with limus-eluting stent restenosis has similar efficacy and safety. PEB remains superior to BA. The sustained efficacy without trade-off in safety supports the role of PEB as treatment option for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis: 3 Treatment Approaches [ISAR-DESIRE 3]; NCT00987324).
Zeitschriftentitel:: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Jahr:: 2015
Band / Volume:: 8
Heft / Issue:: 7
Seitenangaben Beitrag:: 877-84
Sprache:: eng
Volltext / DOI:: doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.031
PubMed:: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26003022
Print-ISSN:: 1936-8798
TUM Einrichtung:: I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Kardiologie); Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen im Erwachsenenalter (Prof. Schunkert)
BibTeX

Vorkommen:

mediaTUM Gesamtbestand Einrichtungen Schools TUM School of Medicine and Health Departments Clinical Medicine Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Kardiologie (Prof. Laugwitz)2015

mediaTUM Gesamtbestand Einrichtungen Schools TUM School of Medicine and Health Departments Clinical Medicine Lehr- und Forschungskooperationen mit den Kliniken und Instituten am Deutschen Herzzentrum Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen im Erwachsenenalter (DHM) (Prof. Schunkert)2015