Benutzer: Gast  Login
Dokumenttyp:
Journal Article
Autor(en):
Gould, KL; Johnson, NP; Bateman, TM; Beanlands, RS; Bengel, FM; Bober, R; Camici, PG; Cerqueira, MD; Chow, BJ; Di Carli, MF; Dorbala, S; Gewirtz, H; Gropler, RJ; Kaufmann, PA; Knaapen, P; Knuuti, J; Merhige, ME; Rentrop, KP; Ruddy, TD; Schelbert, HR; Schindler, TH; Schwaiger, M; Sdringola, S; Vitarello, J; Williams, KA; Gordon, D; Dilsizian, V; Narula, J
Titel:
Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making.
Abstract:
Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology-pressure and flow-as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts...     »
Zeitschriftentitel:
J Am Coll Cardiol
Jahr:
2013
Band / Volume:
62
Heft / Issue:
18
Seitenangaben Beitrag:
1639-53
Sprache:
eng
Volltext / DOI:
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076
PubMed:
http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954338
Print-ISSN:
0735-1097
TUM Einrichtung:
Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin
 BibTeX