Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making.

Gould, KL; Johnson, NP; Bateman, TM; Beanlands, RS; Bengel, FM; Bober, R; Camici, PG; Cerqueira, MD; Chow, BJ; Di Carli, MF; Dorbala, S; Gewirtz, H; Gropler, RJ; Kaufmann, PA; Knaapen, P; Knuuti, J; Merhige, ME; Rentrop, KP; Ruddy, TD; Schelbert, HR; Schindler, TH; Schwaiger, M; Sdringola, S; Vitarello, J; Williams, KA; Gordon, D; Dilsizian, V; Narula, J

mediaTUM GesamtbestandEinrichtungenFakultätenFakultät für MedizinKliniken und InstituteKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin2013journal article

Dokumenttyp:

journal article

Autor(en):

Gould, KL; Johnson, NP; Bateman, TM; Beanlands, RS; Bengel, FM; Bober, R; Camici, PG; Cerqueira, MD; Chow, BJ; Di Carli, MF; Dorbala, S; Gewirtz, H; Gropler, RJ; Kaufmann, PA; Knaapen, P; Knuuti, J; Merhige, ME; Rentrop, KP; Ruddy, TD; Schelbert, HR; Schindler, TH; Schwaiger, M; Sdringola, S; Vitarello, J; Williams, KA; Gordon, D; Dilsizian, V; Narula, J

Titel:

Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making.

Abstract:

Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology-pressure and flow-as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts... »

Zeitschriftentitel:

J Am Coll Cardiol

Jahr:

2013

Band / Volume:

Heft / Issue:

Seitenangaben Beitrag:

1639-53

Sprache:

eng

PubMed:

http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954338