Benutzer: Gast  Login
Dokumenttyp:
journal article 
Autor(en):
Steinhauser, G; Adlassnig, W; Risch, JA; Anderlini, S; Arguriou, P; Armendariz, AZ; Bains, W; Baker, C; Barnes, M; Barnett, J; Baumgartner, M; Baumgartner, T; Bendall, CA; Bender, YS; Bichler, M; Biermann, T; Bini, R; Blanco, E; Bleau, J; Brink, A; Brown, D; Burghuber, C; Calne, R; Carter, B; Castaño, C; Celec, P; Celis, ME; Clarke, N; Cockrell, D; Collins, D; Coogan, B; Craig, J; Crilly, C; Crowe, D; Csoka, AB; Darwich, C; Del Kebos, T; Derinaldi, M; Dlamini, B; Drewa, T; Dwyer, M; Eder, F; de...    »
 
Titel:
Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. 
Abstract:
Peer review is a widely accepted instrument for raising the quality of science. Peer review limits the enormous unstructured influx of information and the sheer amount of dubious data, which in its absence would plunge science into chaos. In particular, peer review offers the benefit of eliminating papers that suffer from poor craftsmanship or methodological shortcomings, especially in the experimental sciences. However, we believe that peer review is not always appropriate for the evaluation of...    »
 
Zeitschriftentitel:
Theor Med Bioeth 
Jahr:
2012 
Band / Volume:
33 
Heft / Issue:
Seitenangaben Beitrag:
359-76 
Sprache:
eng 
Print-ISSN:
1386-7415 
TUM Einrichtung:
r Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie